THE BOOK OF ABRAHAM

ITS AUTHENTICITY ESTABLISHED AS A DIVINE AND ANCIENT RECORD

WITH COPIOUS REFERENCES TO ANCIENT AND MODERN AUTHORITIES

BY ELDER GEO. REYNOLDS.

1879 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH


>

CHAPTER II.

ABRAHAM’S EARLY LIFE IN UR.– HUMAN SACRIFICES.–CAUSES
WHICH LED ABRAHAM TO LEAVE CHALDEA.–CONFIRMATORY TESTIMONY OF JOSHUA, JOSEPHUS,
THE BOOK OF JUDITH, ETC.

OF the early history of Abraham’s life very little is said in the Book of
Genesis. The mere fact is stated that his father’s dwelling place was in Ur
of the Chaldees, where the patriarch married his kinswoman Sarai, where also
his brother Haran died. (1 ) After these events,
it is recorded, Terah, his father, took a portion of the family and removed
to Haran, where he dwelt until the day of his death, but the causes that led
to his removal are not given.

The next chapter opens with the command of God to Abraham, “Get thee out
of thy country, and from thy kindred,” etc., but the reasons why God gave him
that command are not mentioned, not even hinted at. The Book of Abraham supplies
many interesting details on this point not to be found in the history given
by Moses, and that the details thus supplied are consistent with the condition
of life in Egypt and Chaldea at that time, and in many respects corroborated
by the writings and sayings of men living in later ages, it now becomes our
business to prove.

Abraham states, in the second paragraph, into which his book has been divided,
that his fathers had “turned from their righteousness and from the holy commandments
which the Lord their God had given unto them, unto the worship of the gods of
the heathens,” and that “they turned their hearts to the sacrifice of the heathen
in offering up their children unto their dumb idols.” In the next paragraph
it is written, “Now at this time it was the custom of the priest of Pharaoh,
the king of Egypt, to offer up upon the altar which had been built in the land
of Chaldea, for the offering unto these strange gods, men, women and children.”
A little further on Abraham writes, “And it came to pass that the priests laid
violence upon me that they might slay me also. * * * And as they lifted up their
hands upon me that they might offer me up and take away my life, behold, I lifted
up my voice unto the Lord my God, and the Lord hearkened and heard, and he filled
me with a vision of the Almighty, and the angel of his presence stood by me,
and immediately unloosed my bands, and his voice was unto me, Abraham! Abraham!
behold, my name is Jehovah, and I have heard thee, and I have come down to deliver
thee, and to take thee away from thy father’s house, and from all thy kinsfolk,
into a strange land that thou knowest not of, and this because they have turned
their hearts away from me, to worship the god of Elkenah, and the god of Lebnah,
and the god of Mahmack-rah, and the god of Korash, and the god of Pharaoh, king
of Egypt; therefore I am come down to visit them, and to destroy him who hath
lifted up his hand against thee, Abraham, my son, to take away thy life.”

To substantiate the truthfulness of the above statements, we ought to be
able to bring testimony in favor of four points:

1st, That human sacrifice was practiced in Egypt and adjacent countries in
Abraham’s day.

2d, That Abraham’s fathers were idolaters.

3d, That he was persecuted by his fellow countrymen because he opposed their
idolatry.

4th, That God commanded Abraham to leave Chaldea, because his father’s house
had turned their hearts away from him to the worship of strange gods.

If the above points can be proven by other testimony than that of the Book
of Abraham, we think we have strong evidence that the record is historically
correct. Admit this, and we have taken a very decided step towards acknowledging
the authenticity of the entire work. For it is very improbable, nay, almost
absurd, to imagine that Joseph Smith, with his limited range of ancient historical
knowledge, could have produced a work of this kind that would be historically
correct. Had the work been a forgery, that is, had it originated with Joseph
Smith, the probabilities are overwhelming that he would have made some egregious
blunders, which could easily have been detected, and the whole affair, from
beginning to end, proven a tissue of falsehoods.

Firstly, then, we have to show that human sacrifices were offered to the
strange gods of the heathen in Abraham’s day; more particularly in Egypt, as
it is represented that it was the priest of Pharaoh who officiated on the occasions
mentioned by the patriarch.

To substantiate this point we shall make but one quotation, as its author
mentions so many other historians, ancient and modern, as his authorities, that
in quoting it we call upon them to become our witnesses also. It is taken from
Dissertation II, Whiston’s Josephus, and is as follows: “It is evident from
Sanchoniatho, Manetho, Pausanias, Diodorus, Siculus, Philo, Plutarch and Porphyry,
that such (human) sacrifices were frequent both in Phoenicia and Egypt, and
that long before the days of Abraham, as Sir John Marsham and Bishop Cumberland
have fully proved: nay, that in other places (though not in Egypt) this cruel
practice continued long after Abraham.”

We may here draw attention to the statement that this cruel practice did
not continue in Egypt after Abraham’s day, owing, we doubt not, as will hereafter
be shown, to the great influence that that patriarch wielded in later life with
Pharaoh and his subjects, in favor of a more perfect way of serving heaven.

Again, that Abraham’s fathers were idolaters, though the book of Genesis
carries no such inferences, as also that Abraham was commanded by Jehovah to
leave his father’s house because of this idolatry, is proven, we consider, by
the following extracts. We will first turn to the Book of Judith, in the Apocrypha
(chap, v, verses 6 to 9). It is there represented that when the invading hosts
of the king of Nineveh were approaching the land of Israel, the commanding general
made some inquiries with regard to the history of its people. Then Achior, the
captain of all the sons of Ammon, in answer to his inquiries, replied: “This
people are descended of the Chaldeans, and they sojourned heretofore in Mesopotamia,
because they would not follow the gods of their fathers which were in the land
of Chaldea. For they left the way of their ancestors, and worshiped the God
of heaven, the God whom they knew, so they cast them out from the face of their
gods, and they fled into Mesopotamia and sojourned there many days.”

From the above it is very evident that the facts relating to the “call of
Abraham” were not only well known to the Hebrews, but to the people of the surrounding
nations also. As Achior was one in high authority among the sons of Ammou, his
words under the peculiar circumstances in which they were uttered, would carry
great weight, and if unauthorized would meet with severe criticism and probable
contradiction.

But the question is forever set at rest by the words of a greater than Achior.
Joshua, the valiant, God-fearing leader of Israel, shortly before his death,
gathered the people together and rehearsed in their hearing the great things
the Lord had beforetime done for them. It is written that at this time (2 )
“Joshua said unto all the people, Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, Your fathers
dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of
Abraham, and the father of Nachor, and they served other Gods. And I took your
father Abraham from the other-side of the flood and led him throughout all the
land of Canaan, and multiplied his seed.” And again, (3 )
“Now, therefore, fear the Lord, and serve him in sincerity and in truth, and
put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood and
in Egypt, and serve ye the Lord. And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord,
choose ye this day whom ye will serve, whether the gods your fathers served
that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose
land ye dwell; but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” Further
evidence than this we deem unnecessary, as here we have the end of all controversy,
even the word of the Lord on the matter.

We cannot prove, directly from the writings of any authors at our disposal,
that an attempt was made to take Abraham’s life for righteousness’ sake; but
we can show from the “Antiquities” of Josephus that he was maltreated for that
cause. This historian, after referring to the doctrines taught by Abraham, regarding
God, writes, “for which doctrines, when the Chaldeans and other people of Mesopotamia
raised a tumult against him, he thought fit to leave that country; and at the
command and by the assistance of God, he came and lived in the land of Canaan.”


(1 ) Genesis, chap. xi.

(2 ) Joshua, chap, xxiv, v. 2, 3.

(3 ) Joshua, xxiv, v. 14, 15.