Volume 1 Chapter 18

COMPENDIUM OF WORLD HISTORY

VOLUME 1

A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Ambassador College Graduate
School of Theology In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
Doctor of Theology

by Herman L. Hoeh

1962(1963-1965, 1967 Edition)

CHAPTER EIGHTEEN

The History of Ireland

At first thought it may appear unusual that the Emerald Isle should have
a recorded history far older than Rome. There is a reason.

Unlike Italy, for example, which for centuries felt the ravages of foreign
invaders who drove out, in successive waves, each predecessor, Ireland remained
under the continuous dominion of one people. Irish history begins, not with
the Tower of Babel, but at the end of the flood. Irish history is the only literature
which specifically connects Israel with its past. It has long been assumed that
late monks invented this relationship under Catholic influence. Nothing could
be further from the truth. Catholic influence elsewhere never associated the
ancient world with Israel — except the obvious case of Egypt. And in Ireland
the Catholic monks did their best to make it appear that Ireland was not settled
by Hebrews at all, but by Magog! This Irish ‘myth’ had its origin among the
Catholic monks.

How Confusion Arose in Irish History

The history of Ireland under the Milesian kings has come down to us in two
forms — a short and a long form. The long form arose out of an attempt to make
Irish history conform to the faulty chronology of the Septuagint Version approofd
by the Roman Catholic Church. The Domestic Annals were artfully expanded to
make it appear that Irish history commenced centuries earlier than it did in
fact. The task of the monks was rendered easy by an unusual circumstance.

Under the Irish kings, Ireland was divided into several kingships or countries.
Each country had its own sovereign who was related by blood to the other royal
families. Among these contemporaries there was constant strife. First one branch,
then another, gained the ascendancy and held the supreme office over Ireland.
Whichever king sat on the throne in the supreme office became known as an ‘Ard-Riga’
or Arch King. As each King usually ruled much longer over his own kingship or
country than as Arch King, he would have a longer and a shorter length of reign.
At times there were disputed claims to the Arch Kingship, and also joint reigns.
Each of these factors made it easy for certain later monks, who followed the
Septuagint, to alter and expand the official record.

The original and correct history of the Milesians in Ireland has, however,
been preserved unaltered only in the Domestic Annals, the official history of
ancient Ireland. They may be found in O’Flaherty’s ‘Ogygia’. They have been
reproduced in French in A.-M.-H.-J. Stokvis’ ‘Manuel D’Histoire’, volume II,
pages 234-235. The early history of Ireland, from the flood to the coming of
the Milesians, may be found in Geoffrey Keating’s ‘History of Ireland’, but
his chronology is not always correct. In the following tables the Irish spellings
have been generally preserved, including the unpronounced ‘h’s’ indicative of
aspirate sounds, a Hebrew affinity.

The First 1000 Years

According to Irish history the first claim to Irish soil was made by Nin
mac Piel — that is Irish for the Assyrian king Ninus, son of Bel or Belus.
But no permanent settlement was established.

Ireland remained generally uninhabited for about three hundred years after
the flood — 2368-2068 — records Keating (p. 114). In 2068 Parthalon and a
band of Hebrew warriors arrived from the Greek world and established a settlement
at Inis Saimer, a small island in the river Erne, at Ballyshannon. Thirty years
later — 2038 -Parthalon died and the land was divided between his four sons;
Er, Orba, Ferann, and Fergna (p. 120) (p, 118). Twenty years later (2018) a
plague befell the settlers. The settlers were exterminated, save for those who
fled. After 30 years of desolation — 2018-1988 — the remnant that fled returned
to Ireland and continued to inhabit it for another 250 years until 1738. The
total time which the family of the Parthalonians inhabited Ireland was 300 years
— from 2068-2018 and from 1988-1738. Keating records that at this time another
catastrophe came upon the Parthalonians, possibly at the hands of Phoenician
Formorians. Keating quotes (p. 118) a poetic record:

‘During thirty years, full told

It lay desolate, without warriors brave,

When all its hosts died in one week

In flocks upon Mash-n-Elta.’

No Irish historian professes to know when the Formorians came to Ireland.

This second period of thirty years’ desolation — 1738-1708 — puzzled Keating.
He doubted there were two similar periods of the same length, though his sources
preserved the fact that there were indeed two.

A second and related wave of migrants came into Ireland from Scythia. Irish
annalists often have been laughed at because they picture these migrants sailing
from the Black Sea to the North Sea through what is now European Russia. Such
‘poor geography’ was in fact the same geography of early classical writers,
who mentioned the early ease of sailing the same route. This geography is not
unusual when it is recognized that the Pripet Marshes in Russia were once —
in the centuries after the Flood — a vast lake connected by rivers to the Black
and North seas!

The migrants from Scythia at this period were called Nemedians, after Nemedh,
the leader of the expedition. They dwelt in Ireland for 216 years — 1708-1492.
During much of this time they were reduced to slavery under the Formorians.
A part of the Nemedians fled to Grecian Thrace to escape the oppression (p.
126). They returned to Ireland 216 years after the Nemedians first reached the
shores of Ireland. Upon their return they bore the epithet Fir-Bolgs, a name
derived from the circumstances of their oppression while in Grecian Thrace.
The Fir-Bolgs set up a kingship upon their conquest of the Formorians. From
Keating a list of Fir-Bolg rulers may be obtained (pp. 131-132).

Thirty-six years after the Fir-Bolgs returned to Ireland — 1456 — the first
small migration of the Tuatha-De-Danaan occurred. This was during the time of
the Wandering in the wilderness under Moses. The total length of Danite dominion
in Ireland before the coming of the royal house of the Milesians was 440 years
— 1456-1016 (p. 168). Keating quotes the ancient poet:

‘Forty years above four hundred,

There were, since came the tribes of Dana

Across the straits of the great sea,

Till Miledh’s sons first heard dread Ocean

His music beat on Eri’s shores.’

By other reckonings the Danite dominion was much shorter — only 197 years
— that is, from 1213-1016 This second migratory wave in 1213, was in the days
of Barak and Deborah — 1233-1193, when ‘Dan abode in ships’ (Judges 5:17).
Deborah and Barak had delivered the children of Israel from Jabin. king of Canaan,
whose military strength lay in Hazor and Syria. Jabin lorded it over Israel
for 20 years — 1253-1233 — before his defeat. The Irish annals speak of this
oppression. Keating records that while the tribe of Dan dwelt in Greece, ‘It
happened that a large fleet came from Syria to make war upon the people of the
Athenian territory, in consequence of which they were engaged in daily battles
…. As to the Tuatha-De-Dananns, when they saw the natives of the land thus
vanquished by the Syrians, they all fled out of the country, through fear of
those invaders. And they stopped not until they reached the regions of Lochlinn
(Scandinavia), where they were welcomed by the inhabitants, on account of their
many sciences and arts …. When they had remained a long time in these cities,
they passed over to the north of Alba (Scotland), where they continued seven
years in Dobar and Iardobar’ (pp. 136-137). Keating continues (p. 139): ‘When
the Tuatha-De-Danann had remained seven years in the north of Scotland (or Alba),
they passed over to Ireland and landed in the north of this country.’

Many Monkish tales were later told about the Tuatha-De-Danaan to make it
appear they were a fabulous people. When the tales of magic are dismissed the
truth is plain. The Tuatha-De-Danann of Keating’s ‘History’ were none other
than the tribe of Dan, and the invaders from Syria were the armies of Jabin
king of Canaan!

The kings who bore rule for 197 years over the Danites in Ireland are found
in O’Flaherty’s ‘Ogygia’, in Keating’s ‘History of Ireland’, pages 142-146,
and in vol. II of Stokvis’ ‘Manuel’, page 232.

The Coming of the Milesians

The ancient royal houses of Ireland and Scotland, and later of England, are
derived from the Milesian Royal House that conquered Ireland in 1016. The Milesians
were named after Miledh, or Milesius, of Spain, whose sons conquered Ireland
and ruled over the Danites. All the migrants from Parthalon to the Milesians
were distantly related to each other. The most famous ancestor of the Milesians
was Eibher Scot — Eber of Scotia, of Scythia — identifying the Milesians as
sons of Eber, or Hebrews. The children of Eber early settled in the regions
of Scythia, and gave their name to Iberia, a region in the Caucasus in Classical
times. The generations between Eber and Milesius are not completely preserved
in any Irish annals — the records are complete only after the coming of the
Milesians to Ireland. A late fictitious genealogy going back to Magog arose
in monkish times from the known fact that Hebrews once dwelt in Scythia, which
was also inhabited by Magog.

A key to the line of descent may be found in the symbols used to designate
various branches of the Milesian Royal House. Examples are the Crimson Branch,
the Red Branch, signifying the line of Zarah from Judah. Zarah, at his birth,
appeared with red thread about his hand. He was expected to be born first, but
after his hand appeared, and the thread wound about it, the other brother Pharez
came unexpectedly.

The wanderings of the family of Heber to Milesius are summarized by Keating
on p. 173. The final migration, under Milesius, was from Egypt, via Thrace to
Spain. This was shortly before the expulsion of the Hyksos in 1076. Of this
period of Milesius in Egypt, Irish records declare: ‘At this time, there was
a great war between Pharaoh and the king of Ethiopia. Pharaoh made Miledh the
commander of his army, when he had estimated his bravery and valor, and sent
him to meet the forces of Ethiopia therewith. There then ensued many engagements
and conflicts, between the forces under the command of Miledh and those of the
Ethiopians. In these he was so successful that his fame and renown spread through
all nations, whereupon Pharaoh gave him one of his own daughters to wife ….’
(Keating, p. 176).

‘Miledh at length remembered … Ireland was the land in which it was destined
that his posterity should obtain a lasting sovereignty. Upon this he fitted
out three ships, supplied them with crews, and took his leave of Pharaoh. He
then set sail from the mouth of the Nile, into the Mediterranean, and landed
on an Island near Thrace.’ (Reating, p. 177.) After further migrations the prince
landed in Spain to join members of the family he had left behind years before.
In Spain he died. There followed a scarcity of food in Spain for about 26 years
according to Irish records (p. 179).

According to the Domestic Annals a consequent invasion of the Irish coast
was planned to relieve the pressure from the drought. It occurred in 1016, near
the end of the reign of David king of Israel. The invasion was successful. The
Tuatha-De-Danaan were forced to accept the new line of Royalty. The realm of
Ireland was now divided between the two surviving sons of Milesius — Ebher
and Ghedhe the Ereamhon (or Heremon). This Ghedhe, the Heremon, has often been
mistaken by the British Israel World Federation for ANOTHER king of later fame
ALSO CALLED ‘the Heremon’ in Irish bardic literature. Heremon or Ereamhon is
a title, which, in the case of Ghedhe, came to be used as a personal name.

Of this Ghedhe the Heremon, brother of Eber, the ‘Annals of the Four Masters’
reads: ‘Tea, the daughter of Lughaidh, son of Itha, whom Eremhon married in
Spain.’ This Tea is an altogether different person from the Tea who came more
than four centuries later to the Irish Isles. The British Israel World Federation
has confounded two different events, separated by over four centuries, simply
because it was and is unwilling to believe the history of Ireland as it is plainly
recorded. The Tea who married Ghedhe the Heremon was a daughter of Lughaidh,
the son of Ith, uncle of Miledh (also spelled Mileadh). That is exactly what
Irish history records. These events occurred in David’s reign, not Zedekiah’s.
What did happen after Zedekiah’s reign will be made plain shortly.

The brothers Eber and Gede the Heremon founded a town after gaining possession
of Ireland. To be the new capital of Ireland, they named it Tea-mur, the town
of Tea. At different times in history it has borne other names, the most common
being Tara (cp. the Hebrew word ‘Torah’, meaning ‘Law’).

Did David Visit Ireland?

Even to this day another of the names of the old site of Tara has been preserved:
Dowd’s Town — which means literally David’s Town. The name is found attached
to an area three miles north of Tara Hill (see B.M. Ordnance Survey maps, Ireland,
91, 101). Is it possible that David king of Israel visited Ireland and Tara
toward the end of his life?

At the time of the founding of Tara shortly after 1016 an event occurred
involving a beautiful woman who was ‘sorrowful to a harlot.’ The passage, quoted
in the poem of Cuan O’Lochain (‘Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy’, vol.
xviii, 1839, and other works), has never been fully understood. It can hardly
refer to Tea who had long been married to Gede the Heremon. But, if David gave
his daughter Tamar in marriage to Irial, the son of Gede, then all becomes clear.
Tamar had been violated by her half-brother. She left the scene of the unfortunate
event in a torn garb and remained unmarried in her brother’s Absalom’s house.
See II Samuel 13. It was not until after the death of Absalom that David was
free to depart for Ireland, very probably to give his disconsolate daughter
in marriage to a prince of the line of Zarah.

Jeremiah Goes to Ireland

Now we come to one of the most remarkable events in history — the joining
of the lines of Pharez and Zarah in Ireland after the fall of Jerusalem in 585
B.C.

The Bible records God as saying that David would never lack a descendant
to sit on his throne. Now consider, all of Zedekiah’s sons were slaughtered
before he was carried to Babylon. But his two daughters escaped with Jeremiah.
Part of the story of how the line of David through Zedekiah continued has been
preserved in Masonic tradition, and well known as recently as one century ago.
Remember, kings and royalty of Britain have commonly been Masons.

According to this Masonic tradition, a Prince Eochaid of Ireland came to
Jerusalem several years before 585. He was present during the siege. This Eochaid
(meaning Knight) was none other than Oilioll Olchaoin, the son of Siorna Saoghlach
mac Dian called the Heremon. Eochaid was blood royal of the Milesian Zarah line.
After the fall of Jerusalem he married Zedekiah’s daughter, named in the Masonic
tradition Tea Tephi, of the Pharez line. They fled in 585 with Jeremiah and
Baruch to Egypt.

The last Biblical record places them in Egypt. Masonic tradition, however,
traces their journey to Ireland. Irish histories relate the arrival of a royal
party in 569 B.C. (See ‘The Irish Prince and the Hebrew Prophet’, New York,
1896, pages 137-145). The arrivals included Prince Eochaid, his wife Tea Tephi,
their son and a prophet called Ollamh Fodhla and his scribe Baruch. When they
reached Tara, Eochaid was proclaimed king since his father had just died. A
description from the Masonic tradition reads: ‘Jeremiah had joined the hands
of the prince and princess over the sacred stone (lia fail) … and commanded
the blessing of Israel’s God to rest upon the throne of David.’ (‘The Irish
Prince and the Hebrew Prophet’, page 139).

This ceremony was not the marriage of Eochaid and Tea Tephi but, the symbolic
joining of the lines of Zarah and Pharez.

The Milesian Kings

The following chart gives the list of kings unaltered and without need of
restoration, from the Domestic Annals as preserved by O’Flaherty in his ‘Ogygia’.
Both the dates and lengths of reign are accurately preserved. The abbreviations
after the names indicate from which branch of the Milesians the king descended.
‘Er.’ is the line of Ghedhe the Ereamhon; ‘Eb.’ is Ebher, brother of Ghedhe
the Ereamhon; ‘Ith’ is the line of Ith or Itha, brother of Miledh or Mileadh;
‘Irw’ is the line of Ir, another (uncrowned) brother of Eber and Gede.

(Next four reign alternately in 28 years.)

The prophet Ollanh Fodhla lived about 240 years before his time. He was Jeremiah.

(Ruled Western Europe to Tyrrhenian Sea. Time of Celtic greatness in Roman
history.)

(Sent Lia Fail — Stone of Destiny to Scotland (in 513) to officially establish
branch dynasty under Fearghus mac Erc — 513-529. See the history of the kings
of Scotland.)

Viking invasions ravaged Ireland in 843 under Niall III Caille. While Niall
was reigning, his son Aodh VII Finnlaith presented (in 843) the Lia Fail permanently
to the king of Scotland, whose daughter he married. (See O’Flaherty’s ‘Ogygia’.)
The Scottish king, Kenneth mac Alpin (843-858), thereby became full heir to
the now-bankrupt Irish line which was forced to submit to Viking rule. The throne
line was thus transferred to Scotland, from whence it would be transferred,
in a few centuries, to England.

The Throne in Scotland

In 503 a migration to Scotland established the direct line of Eremon in the
new land.

Fearghus I receives Lia Fail for coronation ceremony.

(Royal line suppressed until 843 by a related branch of Pictish kings. For
princes of Scottish line from 741 to 843 see page 230 of Vol. II of Stokvis’
‘Manuel’.)

Dynasties of Baliol and of Bruce

In 1296 Edward I of England declared himself king of Scotland and removed
the coronation stone — Lia Fail — from Scone to Westminster.

Dynasty of the Stuarts

With this outline the essentials of Irish history are restored. For details
of the reigns of each king of Ireland consult Keating’s ‘History of Ireland’,
or O’Flaherty. The modern idea that the Irish were illiterate, and that their
history is all myth, is itself a modern myth. The real myths circulating in
the name of Irish history are generally limited to attempts on the part of the
Catholic Church to hide the identity of the racial descent of the Irish nation.
In fact, the only reason for ever inventing myth is to hide, obscure or pervert
some evidence or truth. Once the source of Truth — the Bible — is manifest,
the difference between myth and fact becomes readily apparent.